What was found?
A clear investigative prompt using careful, non-conclusive language.
Why was it found?
The rationale or deterministic rule that produced the finding.
What evidence supports it?
Traceable source facts and affected entities remain available for review.
How confident is it?
Confidence describes the degree of evidential support and remains separate from severity.
What should be considered next?
Recommendations are investigative actions derived from findings, not automated judgements.
Who decides?
The investigator. PANOPTIS supports professional judgement rather than replacing it.
PANOPTIS language discipline: use terms such as indicator, association, linked to, confidence and requires review. Avoid unsupported labels or conclusions.